Share this article

Riot Platforms Shares Jump Pre-Market After Posting Unexpected Profit on Record Revenue

Strong bitcoin mining performance and data center expansion drive momentum.

Updated Oct 31, 2025, 9:51 a.m. Published Oct 31, 2025, 9:02 a.m.
Racks of mining machines.
Bitcoin miner Riot Platforms posts unexpected profit. (Michal Bednarek/Shutterstock modified by CoinDesk)

What to know:

  • Reported net income of $104.5 million, beating estimates and reversing a year-ago loss, on record quarterly revenue of $180.2 million.
  • Adjusted Ebitda rose to $197.2 million boosted by bitcoin gains.
  • Announced 112 MW development at its Corsicana, Texas data center campus, underscoring progress toward becoming a large-scale, diversified data center and bitcoin mining operator.

Riot Platforms (RIOT) shares rose 5% pre-market after the bitcoin mining company unexpectedly posted a third-quarter profit on record revenue.

Net income was $104.5 million, or 26 cents per diluted share, compared with a loss of $154.4 million, or 54 cents, the year before. The company had been expected to post a 12 cent-a-share loss, according to Zacks Equity Research.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Don't miss another story.Subscribe to the Crypto Daybook Americas Newsletter today. See all newsletters

Revenue more than doubled to $180.2 million from the year-earlier quarter, driven mainly by a $93 million increase in bitcoin mining revenue, the company said. Riot mined 1,406 bitcoin during the quarter at an average cost of $46,324 per coin.

The revenue gain at Riot, one of the first mining companies to report, was fueled mainly by a bitcoin price that rose 6.4% in the quarter and greater operational capacity. The company recorded a $133 million mark-to-market gain on its bitcoin holdings, currently 19,287 BTC valued at roughly $2.2 billion as of Sept. 30.

The Castle Rock, Colorado company, which develops and operates large-scale data centers, also announced the initiation of 112 megawatts of core and shell development at its Corsicana, Texas data center campus, following land acquisition and design completion milestones.

CEO Jason Les said these developments mark a pivotal step toward transforming Riot into a large-scale, multifaceted data center operator leveraging its land and power assets.

Riot held 19,287 bitcoin — 3,300 are held as collateral — valued at roughly $2.2 billion as of Sept. 30.

UPDATE (Oct. 31, 09:50 UTC): Adds revenue drivers, mark-to-market in fourth paragraph.

AI Disclaimer: Parts of this article were generated with the assistance from AI tools and reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and adherence to our standards. For more information, see CoinDesk's full AI Policy.

Mehr für Sie

Protocol Research: GoPlus Security

GP Basic Image

Was Sie wissen sollten:

  • As of October 2025, GoPlus has generated $4.7M in total revenue across its product lines. The GoPlus App is the primary revenue driver, contributing $2.5M (approx. 53%), followed by the SafeToken Protocol at $1.7M.
  • GoPlus Intelligence's Token Security API averaged 717 million monthly calls year-to-date in 2025 , with a peak of nearly 1 billion calls in February 2025. Total blockchain-level requests, including transaction simulations, averaged an additional 350 million per month.
  • Since its January 2025 launch , the $GPS token has registered over $5B in total spot volume and $10B in derivatives volume in 2025. Monthly spot volume peaked in March 2025 at over $1.1B , while derivatives volume peaked the same month at over $4B.

Mehr für Sie

Tom Lee responds to controversy surrounding Fundstrat’s differing bitcoin outlooks

Fundstrat Global Advisors Head of Research Tom Lee (Photo by Ilya S. Savenok / Getty Images for BitMine)

A debate on X over seemingly conflicting bitcoin forecasts from Fundstrat analysts drew a response from Tom Lee, highlighting differing mandates and time horizons.

Was Sie wissen sollten:

  • X users flagged what appeared to be conflicting bitcoin outlooks from Fundstrat’s Tom Lee and Sean Farrell.
  • Lee endorsed a post arguing the views reflect different mandates and time horizons, not internal disagreement.
  • The episode highlights how public commentary can blur distinctions between short-term risk management and long-term macro views.