Gold Isn’t Overpriced on Purchasing-Power Test, BlackRock’s Evy Hambro Says
Hambro told Bloomberg TV gold “could go a lot higher” as long-term price decks lag spot; miners’ margins are among the strongest he has seen.

What to know:
- Hambro said purchasing-power checks show gold has gained against low-value goods but lagged big-ticket items and prime real estate, so valuation depends on the basket used.
- He said momentum can amplify swings and the “trend is your friend,” adding gold “could go a lot higher” if investors keep repricing paper currency against real assets.
- He noted miners’ margins are unusually strong and many equity models still use long-term gold price decks below spot and the forward curve.
BlackRock’s Evy Hambro reframed the question of whether gold has run too far by focusing on what the metal actually buys rather than where the headline price sits.
In a Bloomberg Television interview on Tuesday, the Global Head of Thematic and Sector Investing said internal comparisons show gold stretches further than before for everyday, low-value goods, but buys less of big-ticket items such as a mainstream U.S. pickup or prime Manhattan property. That split, he argued, undercuts blanket claims that bullion is overpriced; valuation depends on which basket you measure against.
Hambro situated gold’s move within a broader macro adjustment in which investors are reassessing real assets versus paper currency. He said momentum and speculative positioning can magnify short-term volatility — “the trend is your friend” — yet the directional backdrop remains supportive for bullion. If markets continue to reprice fiat money relative to real assets, he said gold “could go a lot higher.”
The purchasing-power lens also helps explain why sentiment can look contradictory: prices near records coexist with investors who still see room to run.
Hambro’s point is that gold has preserved and even improved purchasing power for some everyday items while falling behind on others, meaning any single yardstick can mislead.
That nuance matters for a crypto-savvy audience that often compares gold with bitcoin’s fixed-supply narrative; both are framed by inflation, currency debasement and portfolio hedging, but they travel on different adoption curves and risk profiles.
On producers, Hambro emphasized fundamentals rather than making an explicit call that mining shares will beat the metal.
He said margins at many miners are among the strongest he has seen in his career and that valuation models still assume long-term gold prices well below spot and even the forward curve. If elevated pricing persists while analysts raise those “price decks” more slowly, earnings and free cash flow could continue to surprise, though he cautioned that volatility is part of the journey.
Hambro also drew a line between gold and silver. Silver’s industrial exposure — such as solar demand — introduces different dynamics than gold’s primarily monetary role. Tension in lease markets, he suggested, looks like a scramble for physical supply to meet obligations rather than a definitive signal that prices are misaligned.
At press time, gold was $4,202.60, up 59.95% year to date, while bitcoin was $113,042, up 20.01% year to date, according to MarketWatch.
More For You
State of the Blockchain 2025

L1 tokens broadly underperformed in 2025 despite a backdrop of regulatory and institutional wins. Explore the key trends defining ten major blockchains below.
What to know:
2025 was defined by a stark divergence: structural progress collided with stagnant price action. Institutional milestones were reached and TVL increased across most major ecosystems, yet the majority of large-cap Layer-1 tokens finished the year with negative or flat returns.
This report analyzes the structural decoupling between network usage and token performance. We examine 10 major blockchain ecosystems, exploring protocol versus application revenues, key ecosystem narratives, mechanics driving institutional adoption, and the trends to watch as we head into 2026.
More For You
Filecoin drops as bears test support

The storage token faced selling pressure at the $1.33 resistance level while institutions accumulated on the dips.
What to know:
- FIL declined from $1.32 to $1.29 over 24 hours as a bearish channel pattern emerged.
- Trading volume was 180% above average during the rejection from $1.33 resistance.
- A sharp bounce from $1.28 support signals institutional buying interest at key levels.











